Later wrapped rd party those in Google. Smaller webmasters who ran network of sites in some cases got hit with “doorway page” penalties. For owning networks of sites registered in Google Webmaster Tools. Even if each site was a full fledged ecommerce website. Content Farming Is content farming evil? Once again, it depends on who is doing it (and where it is hosted). Long before the Panda update I highlighted some of the informationless videos Demand Media was uploading to Youtube. In spite of Google’s Panda hitting eHow, Google still decided to pre-pay Demand Media to keep uploading YouTube videos. Another thing that is interesting about the content farms and the alleged need for the Panda algorithm was that in spite of flagrant editorial violations by both eHow and Mahalo.

Google didn’t smoke them until it

Could be done “algorithmically.” On the flip side of the above, in some cases Google has chose to keep smaller webmasters penalized because content that was at one point on their site months in the past! Google+ When Google+ launched I highlighted how it was acting as a scraper site by outranking original publisher content. About a half-year later some tech blogger noticed Israel Phone Number List that issue & caused a big stink over it. A Google engineer then suggested that it was childish to place any of the blame on Google. Shortly after that Google integrated Google+ in the search results far more aggressively. A couple weeks after that aggressive promotional integration Amit Singal stated: “The overall takeaway that I have in my mind is that people are judging a product.

And an overall direction that we have in

Phone Number List

The first two weeks of a launch, where we are producing a product for the long term.” The problem with build preferential rankings first & increase quality later is that is the exact opposite of what Google is asking publishers to do with algorithms like Panda. Worse yet, Google not only does this integration when you are logged in, but also shows it on obscure longtail advanced queries when you are not logged in. Affiliates When Google’s ad ecosystem was young they loved affiliates, but that changed over time. In Google’s remote rater documents they BRLists suggested that hotel affiliate sites be marked as spam, even if they are helpful. On Google’s reconsideration request form they also stated: “In general, sites that directly profit from traffic (e.g. search engine optimizers.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes:

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>